I got this information from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/11/6/arab-americans-cryfouloversoutherncaliforniahighschoolasmascot.html

I got this information from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/11/6/arab-americans-cryfouloversoutherncaliforniahighschoolasmascot.html

names like chiefs, redskins black hawks Indians and Aztecs are highly offensive to native americans. Therefhttp://www.newrepublic.com/article/115106/ranking-racist-sports-team-mascots-names-and-logosore they should change it. source

Mascots are a tradition to people and would devastate them if someone changed it. source http://www.newsweek.com/mind-your-own-mascot-157357

Mascot are not racist on purpose! The only way they can be offensive is if it is offensive. coachella valley high schools superintevdent said mascots are not meant to be harmful.

Therefore mascots are not racist.

source http://www.newsweek.com/mind-your-own-mascot-157357

are you saying some mascots are purposefully being offensive or that some are just offensive to certain people.

19chaen says that they shouldn't change mascots and I agree.

Because IN one city the local community tossed out most of the school board because they changed the mascot therefore mascots shouldn't be changed.

levister says that mascots are offensive but I disagree. Mascots are not offensive because a mascot is more of a tradition than to be racist. Therefore people should just keep their own mascot so their won't be a big uproar. ("Arab Americans cry foul over California high school mascot")

I think that mascots should not be changed because it could change the whole community. for example When marquette got rid of the chief there was a 1,200 person protest and they changed it back. Source- "MIND YOUR OWN MASCOT" article.